Turning Point: Charlie Kirk’s Death and the West’s Crisis of Culture

If, like me, you’re still grieving the loss of Charlie Kirk, you’re probably asking yourself the same haunting question: how did a society once marked by basic decency become so coarse and cruel that gunning down a husband and father of two at a public event — simply for holding a different view — could ever seem acceptable to the modern American Left?

Whatever one thought of his politics, no spouse should lose their partner like this; no child should grow up with a hole where their parent used to be. A murder like this leaves a crater of grief around a family, a community, and, in this case, a nation.

And yet, if we’re honest, this tragedy didn’t happen in a vacuum. It is the latest, most visible eruption of something that has been building for years — a steady coarsening of our political culture, a habit of treating opponents as enemies, a loss of faith in our own institutions. America truly is at a turning point.

Over the past twenty-odd years, the moral foundations that once underpinned Western societies have been steadily eroded. What began as gradual cultural drift has accelerated into open hostility toward the very principles that made liberal democracies resilient: free speech, civil debate, and the family as the first community of care. Wars fought on false premises, financial crises that hollowed out the middle class, polarizing rhetoric from leaders and media, and the atomizing effects of digital life have all contributed to a climate of cynicism and fragmentation. Today, the West feels as if it is collapsing from within, not because of an external invasion but because the basic tenets of civilization are being contested, weakened, or abandoned by those inside it.

---

How We Got Here: Two Decades of Shocks and Exhaustion

We didn’t arrive at this moment overnight. It has been more than two decades of cumulative shocks and moral exhaustion. Each episode left its own scar; together they have produced a society that feels brittle and mistrustful.

9/11 and the Security State

The September 11 attacks killed nearly 3,000 people and shattered America’s sense of invulnerability. In the aftermath, Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act, vastly expanding surveillance powers and lowering standards for searches and data collection. The Department of Homeland Security and TSA were created. Abroad, the U.S. launched wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, costing, by Brown University’s estimate, over $8 trillion including veterans’ care and interest. Those wars dragged on for two decades, draining public trust and attention from domestic renewal. Even supporters now concede that the Iraq war, justified by false claims of WMDs, undermined U.S. credibility abroad and deepened cynicism at home.

The 2008 Financial Crisis

The housing bubble and collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008 sent shock waves through the global economy. Millions lost homes and jobs. Washington bailed out banks and carmakers while ordinary homeowners were left underwater. Even though the crisis had many technical causes — lax regulation, complex derivatives, global capital flows — the perception that “Wall Street got saved and Main Street got screwed” took hold. For many, this cemented the idea that the system was rigged for elites.

The demoralization of the American entrepreneur didn’t happen overnight either. For many on the right, a turning point came during the Obama years with remarks like his 2012 “you didn’t build that” comment — intended as a nod to public infrastructure but widely heard by small business owners as a dismissal of their grit and risk-taking. To those who had poured their lives into building companies and creating jobs, it sounded like the government claiming credit for their sweat. That moment became symbolic of a broader shift: the sense that the culture no longer honors individual initiative, self-reliance and private enterprise, but instead treats success with suspicion or scorn.

The Rise of Polarizing Rhetoric

As trust eroded, language hardened. In 2016, Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables” remark became a rallying cry for Trump supporters and a symbol of how casually large groups of citizens could be dismissed as irredeemable. Social media rewarded outrage, creating echo chambers where the worst caricatures flourished. The moral framing shifted from “my opponent is wrong” to “my opponent is evil.”

COVID-19 Lockdowns and Distrust

When COVID-19 arrived in early 2020, the public was told “two weeks to slow the spread.” That turned into rolling restrictions and two years of disruption. Over a million Americans died; thousands of businesses closed permanently. Neighbors reported each other for violations of lockdown orders. Misinformation and shifting public-health guidance eroded trust further. For some, the experience confirmed fears of government overreach; for others, it confirmed fears of citizen selfishness. Either way, social cohesion took another hit.

Riots and Unrest

In May 2020, the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis sparked nationwide protests. Some cities saw rioting, arson, and looting. Images of burning precincts and businesses ran on loop on cable news. Calls to “defund the police” collided with spikes in homicide in several cities. Conservatives saw lawlessness tolerated; progressives saw heavy-handed crackdowns. Trust in policing and in government response eroded across the spectrum.

The “defund the police” movement that rose out of that moment left a lasting mark. Even where budgets were only reallocated on paper, the slogan itself signaled to rank-and-file officers and to would-be offenders alike that the social contract around law enforcement was fraying. In several large cities, retirements and resignations spiked, response times lengthened, and homicide and car-jacking rates climbed. Just as damaging, the constant rhetoric painted law enforcement not as a necessary civic function but as an enemy force to be shunned or attacked. That shift spread a culture of suspicion and even hatred toward the people tasked with keeping order — another breach in the basic norms that once held communities together.

Cultural Flashpoints

At the same time, cultural battles intensified. School boards became battlegrounds over sex education, gender identity, and race curricula. Drag-queen story hours and LGBT-inclusive policies became symbols to some of “perversion” and to others of “inclusion.” Words were redefined; norms shifted quickly. For many Americans, especially outside big cities, these changes felt imposed from above, fueling resentment and a sense that traditions were being upended without their consent.

In the midst of these shifts, debates over gender identity went from fringe to mainstream almost overnight. Instead of recognizing the biological reality of male and female, much of Western culture began to endorse the idea that men can become women and women can become men – the culture has endorsed mental illnesses as mainstream beliefs. This hasn’t been a benign change in language; it has diminished the distinct value of womanhood and upended long-standing social norms about family, privacy and safety. Entertaining what was once widely regarded as a mental-health issue as a new orthodoxy has further distorted reality and deepened the sense that our civilization has lost its bearings — another step on the road that leads to a climate where disagreement itself is treated as a crime.

Headline Violence

Against this backdrop of distrust and rhetoric, high-profile acts of violence have punctuated the news. The 2023 Nashville school shooter was a transgender former student. In August 2025, Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska was fatally stabbed on a Charlotte light-rail train. Former President Donald Trump survived two assassination attempts in 2024 — one at a Pennsylvania rally where he was grazed by a bullet, another foiled at a Florida golf course. In December 2024, UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was gunned down outside his home by a disgruntled man who, according to authorities, blamed the health-insurance industry for his grievances. And now, in September 2025, Charlie Kirk has been murdered onstage at a university event while trying to hold a public conversation with students.

Each incident is distinct, but together they deepen the feeling that politics and ideology have turned deadly — that we are beginning to normalize killing people we don’t agree with. That impulse is the direct antithesis of the Western ethos of debate, persuasion, and peaceful change that sustained liberal democracy for generations.

---

The Rhetoric and the Reality

One thread running through this period is the escalation of language. Since 2016, large swaths of political discourse have turned to calling opponents “Nazis,” “fascists,” or “enemies of democracy.” Those labels are not harmless insults. They dehumanize. They imply that an entire swathe of your fellow citizens is so dangerous that “by any means necessary” becomes acceptable.

There is nothing “Nazi” about wanting free speech, open dialogue, upstanding family values, believing in God, or working for a free and fair economy where families can thrive. Those were once considered mainstream American ideals. Yet when they’re smeared as extremism, people who hold them are cast as villains rather than neighbors.

You can disagree with someone’s politics without painting them as monsters. When that boundary is crossed often enough, you create a climate in which unstable individuals feel justified in committing violence. Social media then amplifies and normalizes the worst impulses — including, as we’ve seen, people publicly celebrating a murder.

---

Turning Point

Charlie Kirk’s death is a tragedy for his family and friends. It is also a signal to the rest of us. Political violence, while still rare in absolute terms, is becoming more visible and more deadly. It sits on top of twenty-plus years of shocks — terrorism, war, financial collapse, pandemics, riots, cultural upheaval — that have left Americans tired, suspicious and angry.

We stand at a turning point. We can double down on division, on ever-more dehumanizing rhetoric and tit-for-tat retribution. Or we can begin to rebuild trust and norms, reject demonization, and re-learn how to argue without hatred. If the West is to avoid true decline, that work — the slow, unglamorous work of civic repair — has to begin now.

---